Key Evidence (5)

Government Exhibit 54

Government Exhibit 54 is the hard drive marked NYC024350, examined by Stephen Flatley and reviewed for emails from the gmax1@mindspring.com account.

Bank records concerning transfers to Ghislaine Maxwell

Documents & Records

Bank records concerning transfers to Ghislaine Maxwell were addressed in the defense's Day 14 closing argument.

Federal Express invoices

Documents & Records

Federal Express invoices proposed by the defense as a paper exhibit during Day 9 procedural discussion.

Flight logs

Documents & Records

Flight logs discussed by the defense during closing argument as records it argued did not show certain claimed travel.

land registry records

Documents & Records

Land registry records concerning title to the Kinnerton Street property.

Physical Evidence (9)

AF9 — AF9 consists of cowboy boots that Annie Farmer identified as boots Mr. Epstein bought for her. The FBI collected them from her Texas home, and the court admitted AF9 during her Day 10 cross-examination.

1 mention

Annie Farmer's boots — The parties stipulated that the FBI seized Annie Farmer's boots on June 29, 2021.

1 mention

boots — During Amanda Young's Day 12 direct examination, questioning addressed boots connected to Annie Farmer's testimony. The parties agreed to stipulate to the date the boots were seized rather than continue questioning Young about that date.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 53 — Government Exhibit 53 is a bag containing costumes recovered from the residence. During Day 5 procedural discussion, the court found the evidence relevant and not outweighed by prejudice, while reserving the timeframe issue subject to connection.

1 mention

GX 51 — GX 51 is a green massage table that Gregory Parkinson identified as having been seized from 358 El Brillo Way on October 20, 2005. He recognized the attached evidence label, and the court admitted the exhibit on Day 5.

1 mention

GX294 — GX294 depicts sex toys called the Twin Torpedos that Sergeant Dawson said he located in a closet at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence on October 20, 2005. The court admitted the exhibit on Day 5 after no objection.

1 mention

large dildo — Juan Patricio Alessi testified that he found a large dildo in Mr. Epstein's massage room during the period he identified as 1995 through 1998. He said he put it in a basket in Ms. Maxwell's closet.

1 mention

physical schoolgirl outfits — Physical schoolgirl outfits were proposed alongside photographs of outfits found in Palm Beach in 2019. On Day 6, the court sustained an objection to the photographs and the actual items on Rules 401 and 403 grounds.

1 mention

the envelope — The envelope accompanied photographs that Jane sent to Ms. Espinosa after Jane became a soap opera star. On Day 11, the court allowed the envelope and photographs while directing continued protection of Jane's anonymity.

1 mention

Photographs (70)

Defendant's Exhibit LV3A — A sealed defense photograph displayed with Exhibit LV3B depicted another person who shared Jane's first name. Visoski associated that person with the Boeing and the 2000s, while distinguishing her from the witness called Jane.

3 mentions

Defendant's Exhibit LV3B — A sealed defense photograph displayed with Exhibit LV3A depicted another person who shared Jane's first name. Visoski associated that person with the Boeing and the 2000s, while distinguishing her from the witness called Jane.

3 mentions

Government Exhibit 101 — Government Exhibit 101 was Annie Farmer's junior-year high school photograph. Farmer, Mulligan, and Swain identified it as a fair and accurate photograph of her from high school, including around the time Farmer met Jeffrey Epstein.

3 mentions

Government Exhibit 115 — Government Exhibit 115 is a photograph of Ghislaine Maxwell. Visoski, Annie Farmer, and Nicole Hesse identified the person depicted as Maxwell.

3 mentions

Government Exhibit 112 — The photograph was identified by witnesses as depicting Jeffrey Epstein. It was received in evidence without objection during Lawrence Visoski's direct testimony.

2 mentions

Government Exhibit 250 — Government Exhibit 250 was described as a photograph displayed on bookshelves behind Jeffrey Epstein's desk in the lake room. The government described the image as showing Epstein with a young girl across his lap, and the Court permitted its use with a limiting instruction.

2 mentions

Government Exhibit 278 — The photograph shows the master shower room on the second floor of 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on October 20, 2005. It was admitted without objection during Gregory Parkinson's direct testimony.

2 mentions

Government Exhibit 304 — The photograph depicts Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The Court overruled the defense objection and later admitted the exhibit after it was identified as a photograph from an investigation CD.

2 mentions

900 series exhibits — The 900 series consists of 2019 interior photographs of the Manhattan townhouse, including rooms, decorations, artwork, and photographs on the walls. The defense objected that the images lacked a foundation connecting them to the charged period, and the Court deferred resolution pending review.

1 mention

911 — Photograph 911 included a small image near a lamp that the Court and parties discussed for possible privacy redaction. The government agreed it had no objection to redacting the image if requested.

1 mention

913 / 913-R — Photograph 913 shows a desk with photographs of children and other individuals. The government proposed offering it under seal and preparing the redacted version 913-R to address privacy concerns about unidentified people depicted in the image.

1 mention

919 — Photograph 919 shows schoolgirl outfits. During a Day 6 evidentiary discussion, the defense objected because the witness had not identified the photograph as depicting the outfits she described, and the court sustained the objection.

1 mention

920 — Photograph 920 shows schoolgirl outfits. During a Day 6 evidentiary discussion, the defense objected because the witness had not identified the photograph as depicting the outfits she described, and the court sustained the objection.

1 mention

Exhibit 909-911, 913, 915, and 933 — Exhibits 909 through 911, 913, 915, and 933 are 2019 photographs of structural features inside Jeffrey Epstein's New York apartment. The court found the features likely to have remained relatively unchanged and stated that the photographs corroborated Jane's description of the apartment as massive and containing stone and old wood.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 106 — Government Exhibit 106 is a photograph of Jane when she was 13 years old. The court admitted it under seal to protect the privacy of the pseudonymous witness.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 107 — Government Exhibit 107 is a photograph of Jane when she was 15 years old. The court admitted it under seal consistent with the ruling permitting her to testify under a pseudonym.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 108 — Government Exhibit 108 is a photograph of Jane when she was 17 years old. The court admitted it under seal consistent with the ruling permitting her to testify under a pseudonym.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 111 — Government Exhibit 111 is a photograph depicting Ghislaine Maxwell. A witness recognized Maxwell in the image, and the court admitted the exhibit without objection.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 202 — Government Exhibit 202 depicts the garage at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence. Lawrence Visoski identified it as a fair and accurate depiction of part of the residence's exterior, and the court admitted it.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 212 — Government Exhibit 212 depicts the pool area at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence. Lawrence Visoski identified it as a fair and accurate depiction of another portion of the residence's exterior, and the court admitted it.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 234 — Government Exhibit 234 depicts the area around Jeffrey Epstein's desk, including photographs on the desk and on bookcase shelves behind it. During cross-examination, the witness viewed the exhibit under seal and agreed with that description.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 235 and 292 — Government Exhibits 235 and 292 depict the winding staircase in the house. The witness agreed that Exhibit 292 showed the wall beside the staircase and that no photographs or pictures appeared on that wall.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 238 — Shows the staff room identified on the first-floor plan of Epstein's Palm Beach residence.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 241 — A sealed photograph shown to Eva Andersson Dubin that depicts Epstein and one of her children, then age 20. Dubin said she had not seen the photograph before.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 248 — A sealed photograph of Eva Andersson Dubin's oldest child, then age 27, displayed from the center of a bookcase. Dubin said she had not seen the photograph before.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 249 — A sealed photograph shown to Eva Andersson Dubin; she did not recognize the person depicted.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 327 — Photograph identified by Cimberly Espinosa as depicting Sarah Kellen.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 327 and 310 — Two photographs: one shows Sarah Kellen in a green dress, and the other shows Lawrence Visoski at the front of an aircraft with Epstein and Kellen. They were admitted on Day 2 after Visoski identified the people depicted.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 328 — Photograph of the entrance driveway to Epstein's main property at Zorro Ranch in New Mexico. Lawrence Visoski identified it as a fair and accurate depiction of that portion of the property.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 704 — Photograph of the exterior of Epstein's brownstone at 9 East 71st Street in New York. Lawrence Visoski identified it as a fair and accurate depiction of the residence's exterior.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 919 and 920 — Photographs of costumes discussed during a Day 5 procedural hearing. The court initially reserved the timeframe issue subject to connection, and on Day 6 sustained an objection to the photographs and the physical costumes on Rules 401 and 403 grounds.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 925 — Photograph of binders bearing blue Post-it labels added by FBI personnel after the items were found. It was admitted under seal because the labels contained identifying information for third parties.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 925-R — Redacted public version of the photograph of binders with FBI-added Post-it labels. It was admitted as a public exhibit.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 929 — Photograph of a third-floor dressing room during the search of the residence, with a safe moved from a closet and items removed from it arranged beside and on top of the safe.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 932 — Photograph of the exterior of Epstein's brownstone at 9 East 71st Street in New York. Lawrence Visoski identified it as a fair and accurate depiction of the residence's exterior.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 935R — A photograph of an open bottom cabinet in an office near the front of the residence, showing plastic bins containing boxes of hard drives with evidence tape on the boxes. It was admitted as a public exhibit on Day 6.

1 mention

GX 201-222 — Exterior photographs depicting different portions of the property at 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on or about October 20, 2005. They were admitted on Day 5.

1 mention

GX 223-225 — Three photographs from the garden room at 358 El Brillo Way, fairly and accurately depicting that portion of the property as it appeared on October 20, 2005. They were admitted under seal to protect the privacy of third parties depicted.

1 mention

GX 226-241 — Interior photographs of the ground floor of the main house at 358 El Brillo Way, including the garden room, lake room, and part of the hallway. Exhibits 234 and 241 within the range were admitted under seal.

1 mention

GX 281, 282, 286, 287 — A series of second-floor photographs, most taken in one of the master bathrooms at 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on October 20, 2005. The court admitted the photographs under seal.

1 mention

GX 285 — A photograph of a desktop in an anteroom adjoining a bathroom at 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on October 20, 2005. The court admitted it under seal.

1 mention

GX 51A, 51B, 51C — Photographs showing the massage table in an open position and its two manufacturer labels. They were admitted as photographs depicting portions of Government Exhibit 51.

1 mention

GX-104 — A photograph Carolyn identified as showing her at age 14 and fairly depicting her appearance when she went to Jeffrey Epstein's house at that age. The court admitted it under seal to protect her anonymity.

1 mention

GX-105 — A photograph Shawn identified as from Melissa's 16th birthday, depicting Carolyn, Melissa, Candace, and another cousin. The court admitted it under seal to protect the privacy of witnesses and third parties.

1 mention

GX-304, GX-306, GX-307, GX-320, GX-321, GX-322 — A group of photographs from CDs reviewed during the Epstein and Maxwell investigation. The described photographs include GX-304, GX-307, and GX-320, which depicted Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, and GX-306, which depicted Maxwell.

1 mention

GX-313, GX-332 — GX-313 depicts Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, while GX-332 depicts Virginia Roberts. Both photographs were admitted under seal to protect privacy.

1 mention

GX-314, GX-317, GX-318 — Photographs from a CD reviewed during the Epstein and Maxwell investigation, each identified as depicting Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The CD was logged under 1B75.

1 mention

GX-324, GX-325, GX-333, GX-337, GX-340, GX-341, GX-342, GX-343, GX-347, GX-348 — A group of photographs from CDs reviewed during the Epstein and Maxwell investigation. The described photographs include GX-324, GX-325, and GX-333 depicting Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, and GX-337 depicting Maxwell.

1 mention

GX-745 — A photograph fairly and accurately depicting the Green Lake Lodge, a two-bedroom home formerly known as the Jeffrey E. Epstein Scholarship Lodge. It was admitted on Day 3.

1 mention

GX109 — A photograph Kate identified as depicting her physical appearance around the time she met Maxwell. The court admitted it under seal consistent with the pseudonym ruling.

1 mention

GX22 — A photograph from a DMV database was admitted under seal after testimony that it was a fair and accurate copy of the database image. The court stated that sealing protected the identity of a testifying witness using a pseudonym.

1 mention

GX240, GX256, GX257, GX260, GX262, GX263 — These photographs were offered during testimony about a search in which message books were seized or observed in the house. The court admitted the six photographs after the defense stated it had no objection.

1 mention

GX245 — GX245 contains two photographs of Jane. The court admitted the photographs under seal consistent with its ruling allowing Jane to testify under a pseudonym.

1 mention

GX252–254 — These photographs depict portions of the interior of the main house at 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on October 20, 2005. The court admitted them under seal to protect third-party privacy.

1 mention

GX269, 271–273, 276–277 — These photographs depict the master-bedroom area of 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on October 20, 2005. The court admitted the group after defense counsel reviewed the images and stated no objection.

1 mention

GX289–293 — These photographs depict portions of the second floor of the main house at 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on October 20, 2005. The court admitted the group after a witness identified them as fair and accurate depictions.

1 mention

GX309 — GX309 is a photograph of Kate. During Day 6 procedural argument, the court focused on the defense objection concerning the opportunity to question Kate about the photograph's context and reserved consideration.

1 mention

GX332 — GX332 is a photograph of an individual whose cropped face had previously been offered in evidence and identified by another witness. The government stated it could not represent the photograph's exact date, and the court overruled the defense objection.

1 mention

GX702 — GX702 is an exterior photograph of Ghislaine Maxwell's house. Kate identified it as a fair and accurate depiction of the outside of the house, and the court admitted it.

1 mention

LV3A — LV3A was an admitted photograph under seal that the witness and jury were directed to review during cross-examination after questions about flight-log entries sharing Jane's first name.

1 mention

LV3B — LV3B was an admitted photograph under seal that the witness and jury were directed to review during cross-examination after questions about flight-log entries sharing Jane's first name.

1 mention

photograph of a street with an address and date written on it — The photograph showed a street with an address and date written on it. The Court sustained an objection to its admission because it was not then clear that it impeached Jane's testimony.

1 mention

Photographs and items recovered in searches of Epstein's Palm Beach and New York residences — The government said in opening statement that it expected to offer photographs and items recovered in searches of Epstein's Palm Beach and New York residences. It identified massage tables, a schoolgirl outfit, and nude photographs among the anticipated search evidence.

1 mention

photographs Jane sent Ms. Espinosa — The photographs were sent by Jane to Ms. Espinosa after Jane became a soap opera star and included images of Jane and other cast members. The defense sought to introduce them with their envelope to show that the relationship continued.

1 mention

photographs of the interior of the residence — The photographs showed the interior of the residence in images taken years after the charged period. The Court sustained the objection on the current record because no witness had connected the later images to the earlier conditions Jane described.

1 mention

Photos 902-904, 917, and 928 — Photos 902 through 904, 917, and 928 show Epstein's massage room in his New York apartment in 2019. The court permitted them only after redaction of the wall pictures, distinguishing structural features from movable or unsupported details.

1 mention

Photos 918 and 921 — Photos 918 and 921 depict several back massagers and a bathroom drawer in Epstein's New York apartment in 2019. The court excluded them, finding that the movable items were not probative of what had been in the apartment years earlier without supporting testimony.

1 mention

Photos 936 and 938 — Photos 936 and 938 depict a room containing a stuffed tiger and a stuffed dog in Epstein's New York apartment in 2019. The court excluded them after finding the later photographs did not reliably show what Jane would have seen years earlier.

1 mention

Photos of celebrities in Epstein's apartment — The government described photographs of celebrity pictures in Epstein's apartment but said it did not plan to offer them as exhibits. The Court reserved judgment on admission while allowing a possible question to a law-enforcement witness about seeing celebrity pictures.

1 mention

small picture showing Alessi's face inside the house — Juan Patricio Alessi testified that Epstein showed him a very small picture displaying Alessi's face inside the house during a confrontation about an accusation of stolen money.

1 mention

Video Evidence (5)

Government Exhibit 296 — Government Exhibit 296 is a walk-through video of the Palm Beach residence. During Day 5 evidentiary discussion, the Court overruled an objection to the video and required a limiting instruction concerning its contextual display of a photograph.

1 mention

GX 296R — GX 296R is an agreed-redacted walk-through video of the October 20, 2005 search, including the reading of the search warrant and the search of the residence. It was admitted under seal on Day 5.

1 mention

redacted 296 — Redacted 296 is a video of the Palm Beach residence. On Day 9, counsel stated that the defense was reviewing the redacted version before it would be formally offered.

1 mention

redacted version of the video — A public redacted version of the video was to exclude the reading of the warrant and limited material requiring privacy protection. The Court directed preparation of that version and noted that its timestamps could differ slightly from the full admitted video.

1 mention

video offered under seal — The video was offered under seal because it contained images of pseudonymous witnesses and nude images of third parties. The Court directed that it be shown on jurors' screens with privacy measures.

1 mention

Digital Evidence (11)

Government Exhibit 54 — A hard drive bearing CART identifier NYC024350, identified by agents and examiner Stephen Flatley as a device examined in the case. Flatley testified that the emails he reviewed from the drive were all from the gmax1@mindspring.com account, and described the device as a clone of another hard drive.

4 mentions

CDs — CDs recovered during searches, including items assigned evidence numbers 1B26, 1B75, and 1B78; one was found in a safe and two were returned in suitcases. Testimony described hundreds of CDs containing thousands of photographs and addressed limits on personal knowledge about the photographs' origin, dates, alteration, and accuracy.

3 mentions

CDs recovered from the safe — Binders containing CDs were among items recovered from a safe, along with jewelry, hard drives, diamonds, currency, and passports. On Day 6, the CDs recovered from the safe were seized, labeled as evidence items 1B26, 1B75, and 1B78, and transported to the office.

1 mention

Emails, phone records, and geolocation information — The proposed questioning concerned the absence of emails from the 1990s, phone records, and geolocation information in light of the age of the allegations. The court ruled that the defense could argue from the evidence presented and the indictment, but could not use Agent Young's direct testimony for that proposed examination.

1 mention

Files and photographs from devices seized in the 2019 search of Mr. Epstein's residence — The proposed examination concerned devices seized from Mr. Epstein's residence in 2019, including the volume of extracted files and photographs reviewed by government witnesses. The court ruled that the defense had an opportunity to question relevant government witnesses and would not permit this line as direct evidence about investigative steps.

1 mention

flash drive with exhibits and indices — The parties planned a flash drive containing exhibits from both sides and exhibit indices for the jury, alongside physical exhibits that could not be loaded to the drive. On Day 14, the parties had agreed on its contents, though the defense had not yet reviewed the completed drive.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 418B — Government Exhibit 418B shows the document properties for Government Exhibit 418. A forensic examiner testified that it fairly and accurately reflected those properties, and the court admitted it on Day 7.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 419 — Government Exhibit 419 contains registry information from Government Exhibit 54, including Windows system settings stored in a hierarchical database. The examiner testified that it fairly and accurately reflected that registry information, and the court admitted it on Day 7.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 420B, 421B, and 422B — Government Exhibits 420B, 421B, and 422B show the properties of their corresponding documents. The examiner testified that the exhibits fairly and accurately reflected those properties, and the court admitted them on Day 7.

1 mention

GX-744 — GX-744 is a Salesforce-generated report of education records filtered by last name, listing completion year, first name, last name, and education type. The court admitted it under seal under the pseudonym ruling.

1 mention

GX21 — GX21 is a Compass database report concerning identification cards and driver's licenses, supported by testimony about DMV recordkeeping practices. The court admitted it under seal to protect the identities of witnesses testifying under pseudonyms.

1 mention

Documents & Records (141)

Government Exhibit 52 — The contact directory was identified by Juan Alessi as the type of directory used by Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein; he recognized its cover, binding, and page format as matching books he recalled. Alessi said he had no personal knowledge of when or how Exhibit 52 was created, and the government later offered selected redacted pages of the directory.

9 mentions

Government Exhibit 12 — Jane identified Government Exhibit 12 as her birth certificate. The exhibit was admitted under seal, and later shown only to the court and individual witnesses so the named person could be referred to as Jane.

6 mentions

Government Exhibit 606 — The 58-page manual contains household instructions, including directions for employees taking phone messages. Juan Patricio Alessi identified it as a version of the instructions he was expected to follow, while noting that it was dated after he left employment and that he recognized some portions but not others; the court later admitted Government Exhibit 606.

5 mentions

Government Exhibit 761 — Professional Children's School enrollment application for Jane. The court admitted it under seal after overruling a hearsay objection; testimony addressed the school's retention and admissions use of the application, while defense questioning distinguished application entries from the witness's personal knowledge.

4 mentions

Defense Exhibit J-15 — Civil-case document associated with interrogatory responses that Jane said she did not recall answering, though she acknowledged her attorney had signed it. The court admitted J-15 on Day 3, then sealed it pending discussion of further redactions to identifying information.

3 mentions

Government Exhibit 52-G — A page from the contact book titled "Massage Florida," admitted under seal with a limiting instruction. In closing argument, the government referred to the page as part of the contact book and discussed entries in its massage section.

3 mentions

Government Exhibit 662 — Pilot David Rodgers's logbook contains flight entries made at or near the time each flight ended, with known passenger names copied from manifests and placeholders used when names were unavailable. The court admitted Exhibit 662 under seal on Day 8, along with a redacted public version; in closing argument, the government pointed to entries listing Jane on selected flights.

3 mentions

Government Exhibit 662-R — Public redacted version of pilot David Rodgers's flight logbook. Rodgers identified selected entries involving Jane, including a November 1996 Palm Beach-to-Teterboro flight and a May 1997 flight to Santa Fe; on cross-examination, he explained that some entries used placeholders when passenger names were unknown.

3 mentions

Defense Exhibit J-4 — Defense Exhibit J-4 was an Interlochen application for the following summer. It was admitted under seal with identifying information restricted from the record.

2 mentions

Defense Exhibit J-8 — Defense Exhibit J-8 was one of the combined J-8 and J-9 documents admitted during Jane's cross-examination. The court later temporarily sealed it while counsel conferred on redactions to protect identifying information.

2 mentions

Defense Exhibit J-9 — Defense Exhibit J-9 was one of the combined J-8 and J-9 documents admitted during Jane's cross-examination. The court later temporarily sealed it while counsel conferred on redactions to protect identifying information.

2 mentions

Defense Exhibit LV4 — Defense Exhibit LV4 was a sealed document bearing a name. It was admitted to protect pseudonymous witnesses and later shown to a witness for identification.

2 mentions

Defense Exhibit RS-1 — Defense Exhibit RS-1 is a QuickBooks-generated report summarizing invoice information related to Epstein from approximately January 1999 through December 2006. It was admitted temporarily under seal pending narrowed redactions for third-party identifying information.

2 mentions

Government Exhibit 1, 2, and 3 — Government Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 are message pads used at the Epstein and Maxwell residence to record incoming calls. A household employee identified the pads and testified that recording caller information was a regular job practice; the court admitted the full books under seal.

2 mentions

Government Exhibit 13 — Government Exhibit 13 is a copy of Annie's birth certificate. It was used under seal while witnesses identified it and confirmed that it reflected her date of birth.

2 mentions

Government Exhibit 1B — Government Exhibit 1B is a message-pad page containing dated messages for Mr. Epstein, including entries identifying Carolyn as the caller. Testimony distinguished entries signed by Nicole Hesse from entries written by others.

2 mentions

Government Exhibit 297 — Government Exhibit 297 is a layout of the second floor of Epstein's Palm Beach residence. Juan Alessi identified it as a fair and accurate depiction, and it was admitted and published.

2 mentions

Government Exhibit 298 — Government Exhibit 298 is a floor plan of the first floor of Epstein's Palm Beach residence. Witnesses identified it as an accurate layout; later testimony noted that the plan and search images did not identify who stayed in labeled guest rooms.

2 mentions

Government Exhibit 2T — Government Exhibit 2T is a message-pad entry dated March 11, 2003, for Mr. Epstein that identifies Carolyn as the person who left the message. In closing argument, the defense referred to the entry while arguing that the records did not corroborate Maxwell's involvement.

2 mentions

Government Exhibit 501 — Government Exhibit 501 is an Air Ghislaine business checking-account statement. It shows a June 18 credit of $7.4 million followed by a transfer of $7,352,825 to Sikorsky Aircraft referencing a green Sikorsky S76C helicopter and executive finish.

2 mentions

Government Exhibit 502 — Government Exhibit 502 is a Ghislaine Maxwell premier checking-account statement. It shows a June 15, 2007 wire received from an account identified with Jeffrey Epstein and a June 18 transfer; the statement did not identify who approved the transfer.

2 mentions

Government Exhibit 504 — Government Exhibit 504 is an asset-account statement showing a September 18, 2002 sale that made $5 million available and a wire to an account for Ghislaine Maxwell. The statement did not state the purpose of the transfer or the type of receiving account.

2 mentions

Government Exhibit 505 — An asset account statement includes an October 19 wire transfer of $18.3 million to Bear Stearns for the account of Ghislaine Maxwell. The statement did not identify the purpose of the transfer or the receiving Bear Stearns account.

2 mentions

Government Exhibit 506 — A Morgan account signature card for account ending 4324 lists Ghislaine Maxwell as president. Testimony connected that account to a $7.4 million internal transfer and compared the card with checks bearing a secretary's signature.

2 mentions

Government Exhibit 603 — Annie Farmer's journal entry states that she returned from a New York trip on January 7, 1996. During cross-examination, the journal was used to examine the trip's timing and her earlier description of a movie-theater incident.

2 mentions

Government Exhibit 823 — A personnel action notice identifies Sky Roberts and appears to concern his original hiring date. Janine Gill Velez identified it as a fair and accurate copy from Mar-a-Lago's records, and the court admitted it over objection.

2 mentions

GX-20 — A sealed copy of Shawn's identification document bears his full name. The court admitted it under seal to protect the identities of the third party and witness.

2 mentions

2A — Exhibit 2A was admitted on consent during Day 4 procedural discussion. Unlike Exhibits 2C through 2W, it was not admitted under seal.

1 mention

2C through 2W — Exhibits 2C through 2W were admitted under seal after the court overruled an objection. The sealing request was described as protecting pseudonymous witnesses and third parties' names, phone numbers, and contact information.

1 mention

302 report — A 302 report was considered in the court's Rule 613(b) rulings on proposed prior inconsistent statements. The court stated that questions concerning one claimed statement did not track the report and did not provide an adequate basis for inconsistency.

1 mention

3505-005 FBI interview summary — An FBI interview summary from 2007 was used to question Carolyn about an account in which Virginia Roberts offered her $300 to provide a massage in Palm Beach. Carolyn agreed that she told the FBI Virginia had described the massage opportunity.

1 mention

3509-008 — Page 4 of 3509-008 was shown to Jane during cross-examination. She agreed it refreshed her recollection that she had told agents Epstein decided where everyone sat.

1 mention

3510-020 — The government described 3510-020 as a note reflecting that Jane called Brian after she testified, did not discuss her testimony, and mentioned having been shown an Interlochen application.

1 mention

3514-001 — 3514-001 was displayed to Annie Farmer on redirect and counsel directed her to the second full paragraph on page 2 after asking about her 2006 FBI interview.

1 mention

3527-007 — Page 86 of 3527-007 was shown to Lawrence Visoski concerning the first time Sarah Kellen flew. He said it appeared to show a regularly scheduled route but did not restore certainty in his recollection.

1 mention

3531-12 — Kimberly Meder recognized the handwriting on 3531-12 during cross-examination. Questioning about the notes addressed amounts reflected in different sets, including figures between four and ten thousand and about eighteen thousand.

1 mention

418B — 418B displayed metadata associated with Government Exhibit 418, including a January 29, 2002 creation date. Testimony described such date fields as information populated by the computer system.

1 mention

52-J, 52-K, 52-L — Government Exhibits 52-J, 52-K, and 52-L were stipulated to be redacted excerpts of Government Exhibit 52. The court admitted them under temporary seal to consider limited redactions.

1 mention

admitted exhibits and proposed redacted exhibits — The parties discussed a list of admitted exhibits and proposed redacted exhibits before closing arguments. The court directed them to confer on the materials and confirm what would go to the jury.

1 mention

AF-14 — AF-14 is the release form Annie Farmer signed in connection with accepting a compensation-program offer. She testified that it detailed the $1.5 million she received, and the court admitted the exhibit.

1 mention

AF-1R — During Day 14 procedural discussion, counsel identified AF-1R as the publicly available version of AF-1 that would be made public.

1 mention

application to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund — Carolyn testified on redirect that she did not write her application to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund herself.

1 mention

applications — Applications admitted into evidence were discussed in connection with whether information identifying who paid for a student's attendance had been provided. The witness said he had not provided that information.

1 mention

AY-1 — AY-1 is a Department of Justice protocol document identified during questioning about electronic recording practices. The court excluded further inquiry from the document as beyond the scope of redirect.

1 mention

Bank records concerning transfers to Ghislaine Maxwell — Bank records concerning transfers to Ghislaine Maxwell were discussed in the defense closing argument. Counsel noted testimony that the records did not state the purpose of the transfers and argued against drawing an inference from the amounts alone.

1 mention

bank-record transactions totaling $30.7 million — Bank records were described in the government's closing argument as showing transfers of $18.3 million in 1999, $5 million in 2002, and $7.4 million in 2007, totaling $30.7 million.

1 mention

civil complaint — On Day 7 redirect, Carolyn testified that she did not write her civil complaint.

1 mention

correspondence between Jane's attorney and the victim compensation fund — At a Day 3 procedural discussion, the government said the defense had marked correspondence between Jane's attorney and the victim compensation fund as an exhibit and raised a Rule 408 issue.

1 mention

correspondence from Jane's attorney to Ms. Menninger's law firm — At a Day 3 procedural discussion, the government said the defense had marked correspondence from Jane's attorney to Ms. Menninger's law firm as an exhibit and raised a Rule 408 issue.

1 mention

Court Exhibit 18 — Court Exhibit 18 was a jury note containing a third name that counsel could not read. The court said it would ask the jury for clarification and prepare a response concerning the schedule.

1 mention

Court Exhibit 19 — Court Exhibit 19 is a jury note requesting the transcript of Elizabeth Loftus, identified by the court as the expert witness on memory.

1 mention

Court Exhibit 20 — Court Exhibit 20 is the Larry Visoski transcript requested in a jury note on Day 19.

1 mention

Court Exhibit 6 — Court Exhibit 6 is the jury's request for the testimony transcripts of Jane, Annie, and Carolyn. The court marked the request and directed counsel to prepare agreed redactions before delivery.

1 mention

Court Exhibit No. 21 — Court Exhibit No. 21 is the completed verdict form, marked by the court on Day 19.

1 mention

Defense Exhibit C4 — Defense Exhibit C4 was a state complaint discussed during Carolyn's cross-examination. The court overruled an objection to including the document after the parties addressed whether its omissions could be used in questioning.

1 mention

Defense Exhibit C5 — Defense Exhibit C5 was shown to Carolyn during cross-examination. The court sustained objections to the proposed questioning and to admission of paragraph 33.

1 mention

Defense Exhibit C6 — Defense Exhibit C6 was an Epstein Victim Compensation Fund submission bearing Carolyn's signature. During cross-examination, she acknowledged that the document stated additional allegations.

1 mention

Defense Exhibit C8 — Defense Exhibit C8 was discussed during Carolyn's cross-examination in connection with an interrogatory question asking how she came to be at Epstein's home. The court sustained an objection to one compound question and later found no inconsistency in a separate question about lewd and lascivious exhibition.

1 mention

Defense Exhibit C9 — Defense Exhibit C9 was an amendment to a prior question 16, adding that the witness was transported by private car provided by Jeffrey Epstein. The court allowed questioning on that answer after finding an inconsistency.

1 mention

Defense Exhibit EF-1 — Defense Exhibit EF-1 is Elizabeth Loftus's curriculum vitae. The court overruled the government's objection and admitted it on Day 11.

1 mention

Defense Exhibit EL-1 — Defense Exhibit EL-1 is Elizabeth Loftus's curriculum vitae. The court allowed her to consult it after it was marked for identification and the government did not object.

1 mention

Defense Exhibit J-3 — Defense Exhibit J-3 consisted of Jane's Interlochen applications. During redirect, the court confirmed it was in evidence under seal and permitted the witness and jurors to view it.

1 mention

Defense Exhibit J-5 — Defense Exhibit J-5 was Jane's application for the summer of 1996. The court admitted it under seal to preserve her pseudonym and restrict identifying information.

1 mention

Defense Exhibit J-8/9 — Defense Exhibit J-8/9 refers to the combined J-8 and J-9 documents. Counsel discussed further redactions and public availability after the exhibits had been admitted with redactions.

1 mention

Defense Exhibit LV5 — Defense Exhibit LV5 was admitted under seal alongside LV4 to protect witnesses permitted to testify under pseudonyms.

1 mention

Defense Exhibit MA-1 — Defense Exhibit MA-1 was discussed as a travel-record exhibit during Michael William Aznaran's Day 11 cross-examination. Aznaran agreed that international trips in the 1990s might not be reflected in the records.

1 mention

Defense Exhibit TC-1 — Defense Exhibit TC-1 consisted of Federal Express invoices based on shipment-time information and kept in the regular course of business. The court admitted it temporarily under seal pending narrow redactions.

1 mention

DMV record and exhibit concerning another person named Jane — The DMV record concerned another person named Jane and included a picture and date of birth. The government said it responded to the defense suggestion that a Jane in 1990s records could be a different Jane from the 2000s.

1 mention

document marked 3512-001 — Document 3512-001 was shown to Sergeant Dawson behind tab 1 of his binder. After reviewing it, Dawson said it refreshed his recollection about participating in a burglary investigation.

1 mention

emails between Kate and Epstein — During a Day 14 discussion of defense summation, the government said emails between Kate and Epstein had been admitted completely redacted and objected to a reference to their content. The defense responded that the content had come in through testimony.

1 mention

Epstein Victims Compensation Fund applications and awards — During Day 14 closing argument, defense counsel said compensation-fund applications asked about cooperation with a criminal investigation and civil suits, and argued that applicants received millions. The defense used that discussion in its argument about money and witness accounts.

1 mention

Exhibit J-40 — Exhibit J-40 was described as a multipage settlement document containing legal terms and the amount received by the witness. The defense moved to admit it under seal because it contained identifying information.

1 mention

FBI 302 and agent's handwritten notes — The FBI 302 and an agent's handwritten notes were discussed in connection with a statement recorded about where a witness lived when she met Epstein and Maxwell. Counsel described the 302 as a type-up of the agent's notes.

1 mention

FBI 302 reports — Amanda Young testified on Day 12 that agents try to take accurate notes, convert them into 302 reports, and review the reports before finalization. She also agreed that 302s do not record the questions asked and were not audio or video recorded.

1 mention

FBI document 3505-005 — After a jury request on Day 15, the court addressed FBI document 3505-005, which had been referred to during Carolyn's cross-examination. The court declined to add a reference to Special Agent Jason Richards' testimony to its response.

1 mention

Federal Express invoices — Federal Express invoices were identified by the defense on Day 9 as a proposed paper exhibit. Defense counsel said it would seek temporary sealing if the invoices were admitted, pending redactions for a public version.

1 mention

FedEx records concerning a gift sent to a victim — FedEx records concerning a gift sent to a victim were among the records the government said it expected to present in its opening statement. The government described them as confirming that Epstein sent a gift to one victim.

1 mention

Flight logs — Flight logs were discussed in defense closing argument in connection with claimed travel by Jane and other witnesses. Defense counsel argued that the records did not show certain alleged flights or passengers.

1 mention

Flight logs of Epstein's private planes — Flight logs of Epstein's private planes were identified in the government's opening statement as expected records. The government said the logs included names of some victims and would confirm travel on the planes with minor girls.

1 mention

flight records — Flight records were discussed at the Day 13 charge conference in connection with interstate and foreign-commerce language. The government said the records showed Virginia Roberts traveling overseas with Maxwell and Epstein while she was 17.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 1500 — Government Exhibit 1500 was Elizabeth Loftus's book, Witness for the Defense, marked for identification during her Day 11 cross-examination.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 1511 — Government Exhibit 1511 was a study involving a false suggestion that participants had met Bugs Bunny at a Disney resort. During Day 11 cross-examination, Loftus said the study's point was that Bugs Bunny is a Warner Brothers character and would not be at a Disney resort.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 1518 — Government Exhibit 1518 was an excerpt from Witness for the Defense, including a passage discussed with Elizabeth Loftus during Day 11 cross-examination. Loftus acknowledged the quoted passage but said it lacked context.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 2 — Government Exhibit 2 was a message booklet containing carbon copies used to take messages. Juan Alessi recognized it during Day 4 testimony and described old message books as kept in a utility closet.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 223R-287R — Government Exhibits 223R through 287R were redacted versions of exhibits previously received under seal. The court admitted the listed R-series exhibits without objection on Day 6.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 243 to 250 — Government Exhibits 243 through 250 were admitted under seal on Day 5 to protect pseudonymous witnesses and third parties.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 418 — Government Exhibit 418 was a Word document printed from Government Exhibit 54. During Day 7 cross-examination, testimony addressed metadata showing a January 29, 2002 creation date and explained that such date fields were populated by the computer system.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 418 and 418R — Government Exhibit 418 and 418R were versions of a document printed from Government Exhibit 54. The court admitted 418 under seal because it contained third-party telephone numbers and admitted 418R with some numbers redacted.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 420, 421, and 422 — Government Exhibits 420, 421, and 422 were Word documents printed from Government Exhibit 54. Stephen Flatley identified them as true and accurate copies, and the court admitted them on Day 7.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 422 — The essay described Maxwell and Epstein as a couple who were rarely apart, great partners, and best friends. In closing argument, the prosecutor said metadata identified its author as “G. Max” and that the document was on a computer registered to Maxwell.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 424 — Government Exhibit 424 was an email printed from Government Exhibit 54. A witness identified it as a true and accurate copy of an email in that exhibit, and the court admitted it without objection.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 509 — Government Exhibit 509 was a Morgan account corporate partnership information application page for Financial Trust Company, Inc. The page listed Jeffrey Epstein as the contact person and president.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and 52H — These exhibits were stipulated to be true and correct photocopies of six pages of Government Exhibit 52. The court admitted the six pages under seal with a limiting instruction on Day 10.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 823-R — Government Exhibit 823-R was the redacted public version of Government Exhibit 823. The court admitted it to protect third-party personal information.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 824 — During a Day 8 procedural argument, Exhibit 824 was described as an insurance document for Sky Roberts that listed dependents, including Virginia Roberts. The court rejected the proposed basis for admitting the dependent information without verification, and the government instead offered Exhibit 823.

1 mention

GX 721 — Government Exhibit 721 was an aerial overview map of Palm Beach and West Palm Beach. A witness authenticated it as fairly and accurately depicting the area surrounding 358 El Brillo Way in Palm Beach.

1 mention

GX-17 — Government Exhibit 17 was Matt's driver's license. It was admitted under seal to protect the identity of a witness who testified under a pseudonym.

1 mention

GX-608 — Government Exhibit 608 contained Carolyn's mother's cell phone number, which Carolyn said she wrote down that morning. The court admitted it under seal to protect Carolyn's anonymity.

1 mention

GX-741 — Interlochen donor correspondence records were maintained as part of its regular recordkeeping and included material concerning Epstein's scholarship-lodge donation and correspondence to Ms. Maxwell. GX-741 was admitted on Day 3.

1 mention

GX-743 — GX-743 is a student's Interlochen file, including application materials and a photograph attached to the application. The Court admitted it under seal consistent with the pseudonym ruling.

1 mention

GX-801 — GX-801 is a FedEx invoice on Jeffrey Epstein's account. It was admitted under seal, with GX-801-R admitted as the public version.

1 mention

GX-801-R — GX-801-R is the public version corresponding to the FedEx invoice identified as GX-801. The Court admitted it as a public exhibit on Day 9.

1 mention

GX-801, GX-802, GX-803 — GX-801, GX-802, and GX-803 are FedEx invoices associated with Jeffrey Epstein's account from the last few months of 2002. Cross-examination addressed the sender information as drawn from the slip attached to each package and compared entries showing that the listed sender varied by shipment.

1 mention

GX-802 — GX-802 is a FedEx invoice on Jeffrey Epstein's account. It was admitted under seal, with GX-802-R admitted as a public exhibit.

1 mention

GX-802-R — GX-802-R is the public version corresponding to the FedEx invoice identified as GX-802. The Court admitted it as a public exhibit on Day 9.

1 mention

GX-803 — GX-803 is a FedEx invoice on Jeffrey Epstein's account. It was admitted under seal, with GX-803-R admitted as a public exhibit.

1 mention

GX-803-R — GX-803-R is the public version corresponding to the FedEx invoice identified as GX-803. The Court admitted it as a public exhibit on Day 9.

1 mention

GX1, GX3, GX4 — GX1, GX3, and GX4 are message books recovered during a search warrant. Sergeant Dawson said they appeared familiar but could not confirm their identity with complete certainty because he had not remained in contact with them.

1 mention

GX18 — GX18 is Kate's driver's license showing her current legal name. The Court admitted it under seal consistent with the ruling protecting her anonymity.

1 mention

GX507 — GX507 is a Morgan account signature card that Patrick McHugh compared with JPMorgan's system-of-record documents and verified was on file. The Court admitted the exhibit without objection.

1 mention

handwritten notes — Handwritten notes were addressed in the court's rulings on proposed prior inconsistent statements. The court found that Jane's denial of a statement in the notes created an inconsistency for that specified issue.

1 mention

Interlochen records — Interlochen records were cited by the government in rebuttal closing argument. The government argued that the records placed Jane, Maxwell, and Epstein at Interlochen during the summer of 1994.

1 mention

J-14 — J-14 is an attorney-client contingent-fee contract between Jane and Mr. Glassman. After reviewing it, Jane testified that she hired him on September 3, 2019.

1 mention

J-18 — J-18 is a compensation-program claim form that Jane testified she signed and attested was true and accurate. The questioning addressed its question about litigation against Epstein or his estate and Jane's reference to an attachment concerning her civil case.

1 mention

J-8 — J-8 was admitted with J-9 and designated for sealing because it contained specific identifying information for a pseudonym-protected witness. The Court later temporarily sealed J-8 and J-9 while counsel conferred on redactions.

1 mention

J-9 — J-9 was admitted with J-8 on Day 3 and was to remain under seal because it contained identifying information for a witness testifying under a pseudonym. The court later temporarily sealed J-8 and J-9 while counsel conferred on redactions.

1 mention

J36 — J36 was a current photograph showing a house and street that defense counsel said differed from Jane's description of her childhood home. The court sustained the objection to its use, citing Rule 16 and finding it was not impeaching.

1 mention

JR-1 — JR-1 is an FBI FD-302 interview report displayed to Special Agent Jason Richards. Richards identified his initials and testified that they reflected his review of the report for accuracy; it was marked for identification, not admitted.

1 mention

K-10 — K-10 was admitted with K-8 in redacted form and kept under seal because unredacted material would identify Kate.

1 mention

K-8 — K-8 was admitted with K-10 in redacted form and kept under seal because unredacted material would identify Kate.

1 mention

land registry records — Land registry records were offered as certified records concerning title to the Kinnerton Street property. Defense counsel said they showed title passing to Maxwell in 1997, while the court distinguished ownership from residence.

1 mention

location report — A location report prepared for the government identified the evidence-item number associated with exhibits shown to the jury. The witness did not recall the CDs' exact locations within the house.

1 mention

logbook — A logbook was the stated basis for David Rodgers's confidence that he met Jane in November 1996. On redirect, he distinguished that meeting from a meeting with another same-named person in September 2003.

1 mention

MA-1 — MA-1 includes entries discussed as immigration-site records rather than airline-manifest information. Testimony addressed a May 27, 2000 entry for Annie Farmer as reflecting an actual border crossing at an airport immigration site.

1 mention

MG-2 — MG-2 is an agreement for sale concerning the defendant's London home at 44 Kinnerton Street, dated 1996. It was discussed during a Rule 16 objection to proposed property evidence.

1 mention

MG12, MG1, A5, GX610A — MG12 and MG1 are HM Land Registry records concerning 69 Stanhope Mews East and 44 Kinnerton Street in London; A5 is the parties' stipulation, and GX610A contains selected pages from a 2019 Maxwell deposition. The parties stipulated to their admission, and the court admitted the exhibits on Day 12.

1 mention

ownership documents — Ownership documents were permitted by the court on a stipulation concerning the timing of ownership. The court said their admission did not justify calling a new witness or delaying the trial.

1 mention

proposed extrinsic evidence of prior inconsistent statements — Proposed extrinsic evidence of prior inconsistent statements was evaluated under Rule 613(b). The court described requirements including a proper foundation, actual inconsistency, admissibility, materiality, and possible Rule 403 exclusion.

1 mention

report of an FBI interview — A report of an FBI interview was shown to Carolyn on redirect. She testified that she had not seen it before that day, did not write it, and had not been asked whether it was accurate.

1 mention

reports — The reports were described as summaries of Jane's interviews, not verbatim accounts or transcripts. Young also confirmed that Jane had not reviewed them before testifying.

1 mention

RS-1 — RS-1 contains travel records beginning in 1999 and running through 2006, according to testimony from Raghu Sud. Sud said he did not have records for travel booked before 1999.

1 mention

S2 indictment — The S2 indictment was identified during the defense's Rule 29 motion for judgment of acquittal. Defense counsel argued that the government's case-in-chief was insufficient to establish each charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt.

1 mention

separation agreement — Alessi testified that he signed the separation agreement when he left employment at the end of 2002. He understood it to require him not to talk about Mr. Epstein's life or Ms. Maxwell.

1 mention

the 302 — The 302 was discussed during a Day 11 dispute over whether identified passages could be used as prior inconsistent statements. The parties also discussed stipulating to what a witness would testify to rather than calling the witness.

1 mention

the affidavit of Mr. Hamilton — Mr. Hamilton's affidavit was considered in a procedural discussion concerning proposed testimony about two alleged statements by Kate. The court allowed limited testimony about the first statement as potentially relevant to bias, without interpretive speculation, and sustained an objection to the second.

1 mention

the document introduced in connection with Gill Velez's testimony — The document was dated 2000, while Gill Velez testified that she began working for the property-management company in approximately 2007. She said she had no personal knowledge of how it was completed or of information beyond what was written in it.

1 mention

this 302 report — The 302 report was described as a summary of an interview's results, not a transcript of a witness's statement. Richards testified that Carolyn had not been shown the report to confirm its accuracy.

1 mention

Trial transcript page 2370, lines 14 to 18 — The cited transcript passage was the subject of a redaction dispute. The court ruled that redaction began at the point where the objection to the answer was sustained and adopted the defense's proposed version.

1 mention

Winters and Jeglic study at tab 18 — The Winters and Jeglic study was discussed as one source addressing five stages of grooming. Its use of vignettes, including a non-grooming condition, was reviewed with Dr. Rocchio.

1 mention

Z-7, Z-8, Z-9, Z-10 — Z-7, Z-8, Z-9, and Z-10 were historical residence documents from earlier litigation, including an opinion, answers, and a deposition excerpt. The court sustained objections to the defense's requests for judicial notice and admission of the materials.

1 mention

Demonstratives (3)

Government Exhibit 1101 — Government Exhibit 1101 was a binder shown to Kimberly Meder after she described copying CD contents to an FBI computer and reviewing image files. The court permitted its use to assist her memory while reserving potential objections, and the government was not seeking admission at that time.

1 mention

GX-299 — GX-299 depicts the layout of the structures on the Palm Beach property before a third structure was built. Juan Patricio Alessi identified it as a fair and accurate depiction, and it was admitted and published during his testimony.

1 mention

sealed images and presentation materials — Sealed images and presentation materials were planned for use during closing presentations on jurors' screens and in paper copies for counsel, while remaining unavailable to public screens and the overflow room.

1 mention

Testimony References (12)

Annie's testimony transcript with limiting instruction — The transcript of Annie's testimony included the limiting instruction requested by the defense. On Day 16, the Court noted that the jurors already had that instruction with the transcript.

1 mention

David Rodgers — David Rodgers's testimony transcript was requested by the jury during deliberations on Day 17.

1 mention

Dr. Loftus's anticipated expert testimony — Dr. Loftus was expected to give general expert opinions about suggestive activities, including leading questions and therapist response pressure. The Court found sufficient foundation for testimony about suggestive questioning techniques while requiring blind-expert limitations.

1 mention

Kate's anticipated testimony — Kate was expected to testify under a pseudonym, with limits on details of sexual conduct she said occurred with Epstein. The Court approved a limiting instruction specifying that the government was directed not to ask those details.

1 mention

Matt's transcript — Matt's testimony transcript was among the materials the jury requested during deliberations on Day 17, and the government provided it to the Court.

1 mention

Ms. Maxwell's 2019 deposition — Ms. Maxwell's 2019 deposition was discussed in connection with whether she lived at the Kinnerton Street home beginning in 1992 or 1993. The Court proposed that the parties consider a stipulation addressing the ownership timeline and the deposition testimony.

1 mention

Parkinson's transcript — Parkinson's testimony transcript was requested by the jury during deliberations on Day 17.

1 mention

Proposed testimony about the witness's discussion with a guidance counselor and her mother's reaction — The proposed testimony concerned the witness speaking with a guidance counselor and her mother's reaction after learning of that conversation. The Court said any testimony about what the mother said would be accompanied by a limiting instruction and kept limited.

1 mention

Proposed testimony about the witness's mother's statements concerning Epstein and Maxwell — The proposed testimony concerned the witness's mother speaking favorably about Epstein and Maxwell and encouraging the relationship. The government said it was offered to show the effect on the witness and her home environment.

1 mention

proposed testimony from Mr. Glassman about what he told Jane regarding cooperation or testimony — The Court proposed limiting Mr. Glassman's testimony to whether he told Jane that cooperation or testimony could help her case. The Court said that limitation might avoid an attorney-client privilege issue, while noting possible evidentiary issues and suggesting the parties consider a stipulation.

1 mention

Proposed testimony that Mr. Parkinson observed an untested white stain on a green massage table and thought it appeared consistent with semen — Mr. Parkinson was expected to describe an untested white stain on a green massage table that he thought appeared consistent with semen. The Court sustained the defense objection to that proposed testimony.

1 mention

Requested testimony transcripts of Jane, Juan, and Kate — The jury requested testimony transcripts for Jane, Juan, and Kate in binders during deliberations on Day 16. The Court arranged for the requested transcripts to be provided with agreed-upon redactions.

1 mention

Stipulations (3)

Defendant's Trial Exhibit B — The stipulation set out additional cross-examination testimony from Sergeant Michael Dawson that a cardboard box shown in Government Exhibit 294 was recovered from a second-floor guest-bedroom closet at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence, and that the two visible items remained unopened in their original boxes.

1 mention

Defense Exhibit A6 — Defense Exhibit A6 stipulated that Robert Glassman told a prosecutor that, before charges were brought, he had discussed cooperation and trial testimony with Jane, including that cooperation was morally and personally the right thing to do and would "help her case."

1 mention

Government Exhibit 1009 — Government Exhibit 1009 was identified as a public-exhibit stipulation and admitted without objection during Day 10 jury instructions.

1 mention

Other (2)

Exhibit 309 — Exhibit 309 was the subject of an objection the court sustained on Rules 401 and 403 grounds during Day 7 procedural discussion.

1 mention

Government Exhibit 14 — Government Exhibit 14 was displayed during resumed direct testimony on Day 8. The jury was directed to examine its child's-name and date-of-birth entries.

1 mention