Day 17 - December 27, 2021
Judge Nathan defined “entice,” directed jurors to the full Count Four instruction, and set a default deliberation schedule.
Full day summary
1. Supplemental Jury Instructions
Judge Nathan responded to jury questions with supplemental guidance on the definition of enticement and the travel element of Count Four.
Highlights
Supplemental Instruction on Enticementjury eventJudge Nathan, with both sides' agreement, supplemented the instructions by defining “entice” and referring jurors to the existing charge.Supplemental Instruction on Enticement“Further, "entice" means to attract, induce, or lure using hope or desire.”— Alison J. NathanThe court supplied the jury's requested definition of a term used in the charge.Supplemental Instruction on Enticementprocedural actionThe court received requests for Matt's, Parkinson's, and David Rodgers's testimony transcripts and arranged to provide them.Supplemental Instruction on Count FourrulingJudge Nathan declined to give a yes-or-no answer to the jury's ambiguous question and directed jurors to consider the full Instruction 21 on page 28 concerning the second element of Count Four.Supplemental Instruction on Count Fourjury eventJudge Nathan set a default 6 p.m. deliberation schedule beginning the next day, while allowing hardship adjustments and expressly telling jurors to take all the time they needed.