Skip to content
Ghislaine Maxwell- Case Archive
personpersonLisa RocchioLisa RocchioClinical and forensic psychologist whose work includes trauma, memory, and the effects of abuse.← All People
Witness

Lisa Rocchio

Clinical and forensic psychologist whose work includes trauma, memory, and the effects of abuse.

AppearedFederal Criminal Trial
218 lines·7 proceedings·4 mentions

About

Qualified on Day 4 as an expert in psychology with specialized expertise in traumatic stress and interpersonal violence, Rocchio gave general testimony on childhood sexual abuse and a grooming framework. She described grooming as a process that can involve targeting, access and isolation, trust-building, desensitization, and control, while stating that she had not interviewed witnesses, received case-specific details, or had personal knowledge of the facts.

Her direct examination also addressed research on risk factors for child sexual abuse, attachment, coercive control, and delayed disclosure. She explained that trust, dependency, deception, and barriers within relationships can affect recognition of abuse and the timing and manner of disclosure, without applying those concepts to a particular witness.

On cross-examination, the defense questioned the limits of her case-specific knowledge, her reliance on literature, her meetings with government lawyers, and compensation. Rocchio agreed that some conduct identified as grooming may also be non-grooming conduct, explained that grooming is assessed as a pattern in context, and agreed that a discussed study did not permit reliable prospective prediction of grooming behavior. The court sustained several objections that limited questioning, and redirect followed on Day 4.

Trial Record (7)

FederalFederal Criminal TrialNov 29, 2021 – Dec 29, 2021Called by prosecution

Qualified as a psychology expert on Day 4, Rocchio gave general testimony about grooming, coercive control, and delayed disclosure without offering case-specific opinions.

Day 4

DirectLisa RocchioLara Pomerantz4highlights97lines spoken

Summary

Dr. Lisa Rocchio was qualified as an expert and gave general testimony on grooming; Judge Nathan limited anecdotal clinical-treatment testimony.

Highlights (4)

rulingJudge Nathan qualified Dr. Rocchio as an expert in psychology with specialized expertise in traumatic stress and interpersonal violence after the defense raised no objection.Open in transcript →
Quote“When children are sexually abused, most often it's not done through the use of physical force, but rather through grooming and coercion in the context of a relationship with the child.”— Lisa RocchioStates the general expert premise that introduced the testimony on grooming.Open in transcript →
Quote“So it's usually thought to include behaviors that fall into five general stages: The first having to do with selection and identification of a victim; then obtaining access and -- to the victim and isolating that victim for the purpose of sexual abuse; then engaging in lies and deception and manipulation in order to build a relationship of trust and attachment with the child; then a process of desensitizing the child to both physical touch, sexual content, and sexual touch; and then finally, a process of maintaining control in order to coerce the child into continued sexual abuse and to reduce the likelihood of disclosure.”— Lisa RocchioSets out Dr. Rocchio's general framework for grooming.Open in transcript →
objectionJudge Nathan sustained the defense objection to testimony that had shifted toward anecdotal discussion of Dr. Rocchio's clinical treatment of patients, permitting only a general description of her clinical experience.Open in transcript →
DirectLisa RocchioLara Pomerantz2highlightsMentioned36lines spoken

Summary

Lisa Rocchio gave general expert testimony on grooming, coercive control, and delayed disclosure; Judge Nathan then set limits for her cross-examination.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (2)

testimony highlightDr. Rocchio described grooming as creating trust, dependency, and attachment as part of a coercive-control environment.Open in transcript →
Quote“So the whole pattern of the grooming process is designed to create an environment of coercive control, whereby the negative aspects of the relationship, the abuse itself or intimidation or threats, are interspersed with these positive or neutral events which causes the attachment to keep going.”— Lisa RocchioRocchio connected her general grooming framework to coercive control and continued attachment.Open in transcript →
CrossLisa RocchioJeffrey S. Pagliuca3highlights82lines spoken

Summary

Defense tested Dr. Rocchio's expert limits and literature on grooming; she said grooming is a pattern and cannot be reliably predicted prospectively.

Highlights (3)

Quote“It typically means I haven't evaluated any of the parties in the case, and I'm testifying about specific subject matter expertise.”— Lisa RocchioDefines the limits of Dr. Rocchio's blind-expert testimony.Open in transcript →
rulingJudge Nathan sustained several objections as defense questioned topics including brain injury, alcohol or substances, secondary gain, and the definition of malingering; she overruled questions asking whether Dr. Rocchio knew the concepts of confabulation and malingering.Open in transcript →
Quote“We're not able to reliably predict grooming behavior ahead of time, that is correct.”— Lisa RocchioAcknowledges the prospective-prediction limitation discussed in the study.Open in transcript →

Day 10

Day 11