Skip to content
personpersonMattMattPublic-record first-name identifier for Jane's former boyfriend, who knew her during part of the period described in her account.← All People
Witness

Matt

Public-record first-name identifier for Jane's former boyfriend, who knew her during part of the period described in her account.

98 lines·9 proceedings·6 mentions

About

Matt testified on Day 3 as Jane's former romantic partner and continuing friend, recounting conversations from their relationship about her family's financial hardship and assistance from a godfather-like figure later identified as Jeffrey Epstein.

According to Matt, Jane said that conditions were attached to the assistance and that she had to do things she did not want to do, including massages. He testified that she said the conduct began when she was 14, and he described her limited disclosure and demeanor when discussing it.

The government offered Matt's account in response to defense challenges to Jane's credibility. Before he testified, the defense disputed whether his anticipated account qualified as prior-consistent-statement evidence and objected to wording that could suggest other people were minors. The court permitted leading questions to avoid that implication, limited the examination to issues the defense had specifically raised, and instructed the jury to disregard two portions of Matt's answers after sustaining objections.

Trial Record (9)

FederalFederal Criminal TrialNov 29, 2021 – Dec 29, 2021Called by prosecution

Matt testified about Jane's earlier disclosures concerning financial assistance from Jeffrey Epstein, the conditions she described, and her reported age when the conduct began.

Day 2

Day 3

ProceduralMatt Testimony Admissibility Hearing2highlightsMentioned

Summary

Judge Nathan limited anticipated prior-consistent-statement testimony from Matt and addressed witness-contact and anonymity protections.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (2)

rulingJudge Nathan ruled that Matt could not give testimony implying that other people were underage as a prior consistent statement from Jane, and allowed the government to use leading questions to avoid that implication.Open in transcript →
Quoteβ€œYes. Well, lead, and that way I don't have to strike the testimony as not a prior consistent statement.”— Alison J. NathanThe court authorized leading questions to keep Matt's anticipated testimony within the permitted scope.Open in transcript →
DirectMatt β€” DirectMattAlison Moe4highlights98lines spoken

Summary

Matt testified about Jane's earlier disclosures concerning Jeffrey Epstein; Judge Nathan limited and ruled on prior-consistent-statement testimony.

Highlights (4)

rulingJudge Nathan limited Matt's testimony to matters on which the defense had specifically challenged Jane's credibility and directed the government to narrow its question.Open in transcript →
Quoteβ€œShe said that it started at 14, when she met him.”— MattMatt attributed to Jane a statement about her age when her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein began.Open in transcript →
testimony highlightMatt described Jane as ashamed, embarrassed, and horrified when discussing her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, and said she gave him few details.Open in transcript →
Quoteβ€œShe would just say to me, Matt, the money wasn't fucking free.”— MattMatt described the limited but emphatic statement he said Jane made when he sought details.Open in transcript →

Day 7

Day 17