Skip to content
Ghislaine Maxwell- Case Archive
personpersonJeffrey EpsteinJeffrey EpsteinFinancier, longtime associate of Ghislaine Maxwell, and alleged co-conspirator in the conduct charged against her.← All People
Mentioned

Jeffrey Epstein

Financier, longtime associate of Ghislaine Maxwell, and alleged co-conspirator in the conduct charged against her.

MentionedFederal Criminal Trial
119 proceedings·119 mentions

About

Jeffrey Epstein was identified throughout the proceedings as the alleged co-conspirator central to the government's case against Ghislaine Maxwell, though he was not a defendant in this trial. The government alleged that Maxwell worked with him to recruit and groom underage girls, facilitate travel and purported massages, and manage aspects of his properties and staff. Witness testimony and exhibits addressed his residences, planes, employment arrangements, records, and interactions with Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie Farmer.

The defense argued that evidence about Epstein's conduct did not establish Maxwell's knowledge or intent, describing her as being tried because of her association with him. The court also considered evidence connected to searches of his Palm Beach residence and New York apartment, admitting some visual and photographic material with limits or redactions.

Trial Record (119)

FederalFederal Criminal TrialNov 29, 2021 – Dec 29, 2021

Jeffrey Epstein was the alleged co-conspirator at the center of the government's case against Ghislaine Maxwell, but not a defendant in this trial. The parties disputed whether evidence concerning his conduct and relationship with Maxwell proved the charges against her.

Day 1

OpeningGovernment Opening Statement2highlightsMentioned

Summary

The government previewed allegations that Maxwell and Epstein recruited and groomed teenage girls for sexual abuse and identified the testimony and records it expected to offer.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (2)

procedural actionThe government outlined its allegation that Maxwell and Epstein used promises, grooming, and purported massages to sexually exploit teenage girls.Open in transcript →
Quote“That's what we expect the evidence will show, that the defendant enticed and groomed multiple young girls to engage in sex acts with Jeffrey Epstein, that the defendant and Epstein enticed some of those girls to travel to Epstein's homes in different states, which the defendant knew would result in sexual abuse.”— Lara PomerantzThis states the government's central preview of the alleged conduct and interstate-travel theory.Open in transcript →
OpeningDefense Opening StatementMentioned

Summary

Sternheim previewed a defense centered on memory, witness motives, and reasonable doubt, while Judge Nathan set limits on arguments about the prosecution and sustained one objection.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

OpeningDefense Opening Statement ResumesMentioned

Summary

Sternheim previewed defense challenges to hindsight bias, compensation-fund claims, and the anticipated accounts of Jane and Annie before the prosecution objected.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

OpeningDefense Opening Statement ResumesMentioned

Summary

Sternheim argued that the government's expected proof would not establish the charges beyond a reasonable doubt, previewing defense challenges to accuser accounts, corroboration, and count-specific allegations.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 2

DirectJaneAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Jane testified about alleged sexual contact beginning at age 14, Maxwell's presence during some encounters, and travel with Epstein and Maxwell.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectJaneAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Jane described delayed disclosure, Maxwell's presence during encounters involving her and Epstein, and later reporting and compensation-fund proceedings.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectJaneAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Jane said she had no financial stake in the verdict and explained why she seeks to keep her identity private.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossJaneLaura A. MenningerMentioned

Summary

After a sealed cross-examination interval, the court addressed a defense exhibit, Rule 16 briefing, witness privacy, and anticipated testimony from Matt.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 3

CrossJaneLaura A. MenningerMentioned

Summary

Defense counsel used school records and prior accounts to test Jane's recollection of Epstein and Maxwell's early involvement.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossJaneLaura A. MenningerMentioned

Summary

Defense used prior interview records to test Jane's recollection; Jane disputed some wording and often said she did not recall earlier statements.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossJaneLaura A. MenningerMentioned

Summary

Defense challenged Jane's prior accounts and recall; Jane disputed interview notes, acknowledged a corrected Lion King timeline, and testified about compensation-related records.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

RedirectJaneAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Jane addressed prior interview notes, financial assistance, memory, and compensation, and said she had no financial stake in the trial's outcome.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectMattAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Matt recounted Jane's later disclosures about financial help from Jeffrey Epstein and her limited account of what happened; the Court sustained objections to parts of his testimony.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectMattAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Matt recounted Jane's 2011 confrontation with her mother and her later identification of Ghislaine Maxwell.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 4

DirectPaul KaneAndrew RohrbachMentioned

Summary

Paul Kane read enrollment-application entries, including Mr. Jeffrey Epstein as financially responsible for attendance.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossPaul KaneLaura A. MenningerMentioned

Summary

Defense cross-examination tested the limits of Paul Kane's knowledge about the enrollment application, and Judge Nathan restricted reading an agent's name aloud.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectJuan Patricio AlessiMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Juan Patricio Alessi described his work running Epstein's Palm Beach house, Maxwell's daily household instructions, and the residence layouts admitted into evidence.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectJuan Patricio AlessiMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Alessi described Palm Beach household instructions, transportation and travel involving Jane and Virginia Roberts, massage scheduling, and a directory associated with Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

ProceduralExhibit 52 Foundation HearingMentioned

Summary

Judge Nathan addressed foundation for Exhibit 52, set a proposed redacted-exhibit process, and said unsupported testimony that the book was a later version would be struck.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

sidebarExhibit 52 Foundation SidebarMentioned

Summary

Judge Nathan sustained a foundation objection, instructed the jury to disregard earlier testimony about Exhibit 52, and allowed defense voir dire before deciding admission.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 5

ProceduralParkinson Evidence Admissibility Hearing1highlightMentioned

Summary

The Court allowed disputed visual evidence with limiting instructions but excluded proposed testimony about an untested stain on a massage table.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

rulingThe Court overruled the defense objection to Government Exhibit 250, finding that its placement near Epstein's desk provided context distinct from the pretrial rulings, and directed the parties to craft a limiting instruction.Open in transcript →
CrossJuan Patricio AlessiJeffrey S. PagliucaMentioned

Summary

Alessi attributed differences between his current and earlier testimony about Jane to confusion; Judge Nathan sustained an objection, and Alessi identified his signature on a 2020 declaration.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectGregory ParkinsonMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Parkinson described the 2005 search of 358 El Brillo Way and authenticated photographs and a redacted walk-through video admitted by the Court.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectMichael DawsonMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Sergeant Dawson described the 2005 search of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence, and the Court admitted several related exhibits; he could not fully confirm the identity of later-shown message pads.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 6

DirectKateLara Pomerantz2highlightsMentioned

Summary

Kate testified about meeting Maxwell at 17, being brought to Epstein for massages in London and later traveling to his properties, then addressed her substance-use history, immigration status, and compensation award.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (2)

testimony highlightKate testified that Maxwell called her to meet Epstein at Maxwell's London house, introduced her to him, and prompted her to massage his feet and shoulders.Open in transcript →
Quote“I was -- I did not want to admit what had happened to me. And I felt that by ceasing communication, I would have to acknowledge the events that had taken place and I would have to say something.”— KateKate explained why she continued communicating with Epstein despite her account of the events.Open in transcript →
CrossKateBobbi C. SternheimMentioned

Summary

Defense cross-examined Kate about memory, later contact with Jeffrey Epstein, compensation, and immigration issues; the court limited proposed visa and email evidence.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

RedirectKateLara PomerantzMentioned

Summary

Kate addressed immigration, public statements, memory, and compensation on redirect, again identifying Maxwell's presence during an event involving Epstein when Kate was 17.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

RecrossKateBobbi C. SternheimMentioned

Summary

Defense recross-examined Kate on memory, immigration, and compensation; the court sustained several objections and admitted two redacted defense exhibits under seal.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectPatrick McHughAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

A JPMorgan executive authenticated bank records and described transactions recorded for Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectKelly MaguireAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

FBI agent Kelly Maguire documented the search of Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan residence, the recovery of CDs and hard drives, and the later return of items from a safe.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossKelly MaguireChristian R. EverdellMentioned

Summary

Maguire testified that 2019 search photographs could not establish earlier conditions at Epstein's residence and described the recovery and later review of CDs.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectKimberly MederMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

FBI analyst Kimberly Meder described reviewing and matching CD image files to FBI evidence records, then identified Maxwell and Epstein in a proposed photograph exhibit.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 7

DirectKimberly MederMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Kimberly Meder identified photographs from investigation CDs as the court admitted a series of Government exhibits, including two under seal.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossKimberly MederLaura A. MenningerMentioned

Summary

The defense emphasized that Kimberly Meder reviewed thousands of photographs but lacked personal knowledge of their provenance, dates, alteration, and accuracy.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectCarolynMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Carolyn testified that Maxwell arranged appointments at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house and described repeated paid, sexualized massage encounters beginning when she was 14.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossCarolynJeffrey S. PagliucaMentioned

Summary

Defense challenged Carolyn with earlier statements and filings, while the court limited some impeachment evidence and allowed selected complaint and interrogatory excerpts.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

RedirectCarolynMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Carolyn addressed prior records, her age when she first encountered Maxwell and Epstein, and her stated reasons for testifying.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 8

DirectShawnMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Shawn described Carolyn's introduction to Jeffrey Epstein, repeated visits to the Palm Beach house, cash payments, and calls he said arranged her work.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectShawnMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Shawn described Melissa's visits to Jeffrey Epstein's house and cash payments, while also acknowledging drug use and prior felony convictions.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossShawnJeffrey S. PagliucaMentioned

Summary

Shawn was questioned about the limits of his caller-identification testimony and acknowledged receiving money from Carolyn and using drugs with her.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectNicole HesseAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Nicole Hesse described working at the Palm Beach home, receiving directions from Maxwell, and using message pads later identified as Government Exhibits 1, 2, and 3.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectNicole HesseAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Nicole Hesse identified Carolyn on several message-pad exhibits and described her part-time work at the Palm Beach house.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossNicole HesseJeffrey S. PagliucaMentioned

Summary

Nicole Hesse described limited firsthand knowledge of events at the Palm Beach house as the defense distinguished her message-pad entries from those written by others.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectDavid RodgersMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Pilot David Rodgers authenticated his flight logbook and described Maxwell's role in flight communications and Epstein's operations.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectDavid RodgersMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

David Rodgers used flight-log entries to identify travel involving Epstein, Maxwell, Jane, and Virginia Roberts; the jury also viewed Government Exhibit 14.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossDavid RodgersChristian R. EverdellMentioned

Summary

David Rodgers acknowledged that key flight-date testimony rested on his logbook, whose earlier entries listed only Jane's true first name, while describing his observations and Maxwell's work role.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

RedirectDavid RodgersMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

David Rodgers tied his recollection of meeting Jane to his logbook; the court then addressed defense-case timing, a charge conference, and briefing on 52.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 9

CrossTracy ChapellChristian R. EverdellMentioned

Summary

Defense counsel used FedEx invoice entries to distinguish listed senders, and the court admitted a defense set of additional verified invoices under temporary seal.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 10

DirectAnnie FarmerLara PomerantzMentioned

Summary

Annie testified about a 1995 New York trip, her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, and journal entries describing her reaction to touching during a movie.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectAnnie FarmerLara PomerantzMentioned

Summary

Annie described a 1996 New Mexico trip involving Maxwell and Epstein, including alleged touching during a movie, a foot-massage demonstration, and a massage by Maxwell.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectAnnie FarmerLara PomerantzMentioned

Summary

Annie described earlier disclosures and interviews, then testified about a $1.5 million victim-compensation-fund award and her lack of a financial stake in the verdict.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

RedirectAnnie FarmerLara PomerantzMentioned

Summary

Annie reaffirmed parts of her 2006 FBI account and explained why she remembered the alleged massage; the Court resolved repeated defense objections during redirect.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectDavid James MulliganLara PomerantzMentioned

Summary

Mulligan recounted Annie Farmer's reported disclosures about trips and alleged conduct involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including a New Mexico massage.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectJanice SwainLara PomerantzMentioned

Summary

Janice Swain described Epstein's calls about Annie Farmer's trips, her reasons for allowing them, and Annie's withdrawn demeanor after returning from New Mexico.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossJanice SwainLaura A. MenningerMentioned

Summary

Swain said she had no direct contact with Maxwell and did not know what Maxwell knew about Annie's trip; the Court limited Rule 806 questioning before the government rested.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 11

DirectCimberly EspinosaChristian R. Everdell1highlightMentioned

Summary

Ms. Espinosa described Maxwell's estate-management work, Jane's contacts with the office, and defense exhibits involving mailed headshots, while saying she never observed inappropriate conduct with underage girls.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

Quote“She was the estate manager, in my mind. She ran the properties for Jeffrey Epstein.”— Ms. EspinosaDescribed Maxwell's role in the office and property operations from the witness's perspective.Open in transcript →
CrossRaghu SudAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Ms. Moe established that Sud's available travel-agency records began in 1999, and he said he had no earlier records.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 12

CrossAmanda YoungMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Young described Jane's disclosures as occurring over time and confirmed the reports were summaries; the court sustained scope objections.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectEva Andersson DubinJeffrey S. PagliucaMentioned

Summary

Dr. Dubin said she had not observed inappropriate conduct by Jeffrey Epstein with teenage females from roughly 1994 through 2004 as the court limited media-coverage questioning and admitted redacted flight records.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossEva Andersson DubinAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Dr. Dubin described limited knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house and acknowledged memory difficulties that she believed related to medical issues.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectMichelle HealyLaura A. MenningerMentioned

Summary

Ms. Healy described her work at J. Epstein and Company, gave a favorable account of Maxwell as a supervisor, and denied involvement in alleged group sexualized massages.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossMichelle HealyMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Ms. Healy's cross-examination established the limits of her firsthand access to Epstein's homes and travel as the parties resolved evidence issues, rested, and moved the case toward closing arguments.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 14

ClosingGovernment closing argument1highlightMentioned

Summary

The government urged conviction, arguing that witness testimony and records showed a repeated alleged grooming scheme and rebutted defense credibility and memory challenges.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

procedural actionThe government opened by presenting an eight-part argument that the trial evidence showed Maxwell knowingly participated in a scheme with Jeffrey Epstein.Open in transcript →
ClosingDefense closing argument1highlightMentioned

Summary

Menninger urged acquittal, arguing that the government had not proved Maxwell's participation in the charged conduct beyond a reasonable doubt.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

Quote“Ghislaine Maxwell is not Jeffrey Epstein.”— Laura A. MenningerMenninger urged jurors to separate the allegations against Maxwell from evidence concerning Epstein.Open in transcript →
ProceduralDefense summation objectionsMentioned

Summary

Judge Nathan declined an additional curative instruction and overruled the government's narrowed objection to defense summation comments about interviews.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 17