Skip to content
Federal Criminal Trialtrial-daytrial-dayAlison MoeAndrew RohrbachLaura A. MenningerBobbi C. SternheimDaniel Alan BesselsenJaneMattcrossredirectdirectDay 3 - December 1, 2021Jane's cross-examination focused on prior accounts and compensation, followed by redirect, Matt's testimony, and Interlochen records.
← Day 2Federal Criminal TrialDay 4 →

Day 3 - December 1, 2021

Jane's Cross-Examination, Matt's Testimony, and Interlochen Records

Judge Alison J. Nathan
15Proceedings
5Pages
3Witnesses
3,499Lines
6Sidebars
Day 3 of 19
Appearing:

Jane's cross-examination focused on prior accounts and compensation, followed by redirect, Matt's testimony, and Interlochen records.

Full day summary

Defense cross-examined Jane at length about prior government interview notes, travel and age timelines, early interactions with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, her reporting history, civil claims, and compensation. Jane disputed the accuracy of some unrecorded notes, accepted some earlier recorded answers after reviewing them, and acknowledged that one Lion King timeline was wrong. Judge Nathan repeatedly addressed the foundation for impeachment, ruled that lack of recall alone was not an inconsistent statement, and set limits on questions about civil-litigation demands and attorney communications. On redirect, Jane said prosecutors did not tell her what to say and described why discussing her experiences in government meetings had initially been difficult. The government then called Matt, who testified about Jane's disclosures during their relationship; the court limited the scope of that testimony and sustained objections to portions of it. Daniel Alan Besselsen authenticated Interlochen records concerning Epstein's scholarship-lodge donation and student attendance records.

2. Jane — Cross/Redirect (Continued)

Jane continued under cross-examination about prior accounts, recollection, and compensation issues before responding on redirect.

→
Procedural
Pre-Cross Trial-Management Conference
48 lines

Judge Nathan set procedures for anonymity concerns and defense exhibit binders, directing counsel to raise admissibility objections as particular materials arose.

Cross
Jane — Cross Jane Laura A. Menninger
751 lines

Defense used applications and prior interview records to test Jane's memory of Maxwell's involvement; Judge Nathan set limits on impeachment through prior statements.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Prior Statements and Witness MemoryCounsel and the court discussed the proper method for questioning a witness about prior statements when the witness does not recall them.
Procedural
Midmorning Evidentiary and Trial-Management Hearing
78 lines

Judge Nathan limited proposed impeachment questions about civil claims and compensation to Jane's personal knowledge and asked the government to research Rule 408 further.

Cross
Jane — Cross Resumed Jane Laura A. Menninger
1078 lines

Defense challenged Jane's chronology, prior interview notes, potential corroboration, delayed reporting, and compensation claims; Jane disputed parts of the notes and acknowledged a correction to the Lion King timeline.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Investigative Techniques ObjectionAt sidebar, the government objected to questioning about investigative techniques and investigative steps under a prior in limine ruling.
Procedural
Lunch Recess Evidentiary Hearing
149 lines

Judge Nathan overruled an objection to Exhibit J-40 and limited proposed cross-examination of Jane about potential civil-recovery expectations.

Cross
Jane — Cross Resumed 2 Jane Laura A. Menninger
337 lines

Defense tested Jane's recollection and prior accounts; Judge Nathan admitted three defense exhibits.

Redirect
Jane — Redirect Jane Alison Moe
292 lines

Jane addressed prior interview notes, financial assistance, memory, and compensation, and said she had no financial stake in the trial's outcome.

Highlights

5. Pseudonym and Privilege-Briefing Matters

Outside the jury's presence, the Court held a sealed pseudonym-issue sidebar and set briefing deadlines on a proposed privilege-waiver issue involving Glassman.

→
sidebar
Sealed Pseudonym Issue Sidebar
5 lines

The parties raised a pseudonym-related issue for discussion at a sealed sidebar.

sidebar
Glassman Privilege Briefing Schedule
28 lines

The parties discussed briefing a proposed privilege-waiver basis for calling Glassman and gave estimates for the remaining trial schedule.

← Day 2Federal Criminal TrialDay 4 →