Skip to content
personpersonGhislaine MaxwellGhislaine MaxwellLongtime associate of Jeffrey Epstein and defendant in this federal criminal case.← All People
Defendant· Defense

Ghislaine Maxwell

Longtime associate of Jeffrey Epstein and defendant in this federal criminal case.

88 proceedings·88 mentions

About

The government's opening alleged that Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein recruited and groomed teenage girls through friendship, promises of opportunity, and purported massages, and that Maxwell facilitated the alleged abuse. Maxwell was the defendant charged on six counts, including conspiracy, enticement, transportation, and sex-trafficking counts arising from the alleged conduct described at trial.

The defense opening argued that the government could not prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. Defense counsel characterized Maxwell as being tried because of her association with Epstein and challenged the accusers' memories, changing accounts, compensation-related incentives, and the government's proof of Maxwell's knowledge and intent.

Witnesses described Maxwell's alleged role in Epstein's operations and in events central to the government's theory. Jane and Kate testified about alleged interactions involving Maxwell. Household employees and pilots described work responsibilities, instructions, and flight-related records connected to Maxwell, while financial and photographic records were also introduced.

The defense sought to use property records to challenge Kate's account of where Maxwell lived, and the court questioned whether ownership records established residence. In closing, the defense argued that the evidence did not prove Maxwell's own participation in an unlawful agreement or conduct. During jury deliberations, Judge Nathan declined the defense's proposed supplemental instruction concerning New Mexico-related conduct and Counts Two or Four, concluding that the existing instruction was correct.

Trial Record (88)

FederalFederal Criminal TrialNov 29, 2021 – Dec 29, 2021

The trial centered on allegations that Maxwell helped Jeffrey Epstein recruit and groom teenage girls for sexual abuse, which the defense disputed as unproven and based on unreliable accounts.

Day 1

OpeningGovernment Opening Statement1highlightMentioned

Summary

The government previewed allegations that Maxwell and Epstein recruited and groomed teenage girls for sexual abuse and identified the testimony and records it expected to offer.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

procedural actionThe government outlined its allegation that Maxwell and Epstein used promises, grooming, and purported massages to sexually exploit teenage girls.Open in transcript →
OpeningDefense Opening Statement1highlightMentioned

Summary

Sternheim previewed a defense centered on memory, witness motives, and reasonable doubt, while Judge Nathan set limits on arguments about the prosecution and sustained one objection.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

otherSternheim opened by arguing that the government must prove Maxwell's conduct, rather than Epstein's, beyond a reasonable doubt and previewed a defense centered on memory, manipulation, and money.Open in transcript →
sidebarSidebar on Opening-Statement Evidentiary LimitsMentioned

Summary

Judge Nathan limited the defense's opening argument about civil lawyers, allowing a narrower inference argument while barring unbriefed lawyer testimony and unsupported claims that lawyers told witnesses what to say.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

OpeningDefense Opening Statement ResumesMentioned

Summary

Sternheim previewed defense challenges to hindsight bias, compensation-fund claims, and the anticipated accounts of Jane and Annie before the prosecution objected.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

OpeningDefense Opening Statement ResumesMentioned

Summary

Sternheim argued that the government's expected proof would not establish the charges beyond a reasonable doubt, previewing defense challenges to accuser accounts, corroboration, and count-specific allegations.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 2

DirectLawrence VisoskiMaurene Comey1highlightMentioned

Summary

Visoski described Maxwell's reported office role, Epstein's properties and aircraft, and how pilots kept passenger manifests.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

testimony highlightVisoski characterized Maxwell as second to Epstein in the employee hierarchy and said she handled much of the office's finances and expenses.Open in transcript →
DirectJaneAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Jane testified about alleged sexual contact beginning at age 14, Maxwell's presence during some encounters, and travel with Epstein and Maxwell.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectJaneAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Jane described delayed disclosure, Maxwell's presence during encounters involving her and Epstein, and later reporting and compensation-fund proceedings.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectJaneAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Jane said she had no financial stake in the verdict and explained why she seeks to keep her identity private.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 3

CrossJaneLaura A. MenningerMentioned

Summary

Defense counsel used school records and prior accounts to test Jane's recollection of Epstein and Maxwell's early involvement.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossJaneLaura A. MenningerMentioned

Summary

Defense used prior interview records to test Jane's recollection; Jane disputed some wording and often said she did not recall earlier statements.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossJaneLaura A. MenningerMentioned

Summary

Defense challenged Jane's prior accounts and recall; Jane disputed interview notes, acknowledged a corrected Lion King timeline, and testified about compensation-related records.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

RedirectJaneAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Jane addressed prior interview notes, financial assistance, memory, and compensation, and said she had no financial stake in the trial's outcome.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectMattAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Matt recounted Jane's 2011 confrontation with her mother and her later identification of Ghislaine Maxwell.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 4

DirectJuan Patricio AlessiMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Juan Patricio Alessi described his work running Epstein's Palm Beach house, Maxwell's daily household instructions, and the residence layouts admitted into evidence.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectJuan Patricio AlessiMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Alessi described Palm Beach household instructions, transportation and travel involving Jane and Virginia Roberts, massage scheduling, and a directory associated with Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

sidebarExhibit 52 Foundation SidebarMentioned

Summary

Judge Nathan sustained a foundation objection, instructed the jury to disregard earlier testimony about Exhibit 52, and allowed defense voir dire before deciding admission.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 5

Day 6

DirectKateLara Pomerantz1highlightMentioned

Summary

Kate testified about meeting Maxwell at 17, being brought to Epstein for massages in London and later traveling to his properties, then addressed her substance-use history, immigration status, and compensation award.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

testimony highlightKate testified that Maxwell called her to meet Epstein at Maxwell's London house, introduced her to him, and prompted her to massage his feet and shoulders.Open in transcript →
CrossKateBobbi C. SternheimMentioned

Summary

Defense cross-examined Kate about memory, later contact with Jeffrey Epstein, compensation, and immigration issues; the court limited proposed visa and email evidence.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

RedirectKateLara PomerantzMentioned

Summary

Kate addressed immigration, public statements, memory, and compensation on redirect, again identifying Maxwell's presence during an event involving Epstein when Kate was 17.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

RecrossKateBobbi C. SternheimMentioned

Summary

Defense recross-examined Kate on memory, immigration, and compensation; the court sustained several objections and admitted two redacted defense exhibits under seal.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectPatrick McHughAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

A JPMorgan executive authenticated bank records and described transactions recorded for Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectKimberly MederMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

FBI analyst Kimberly Meder described reviewing and matching CD image files to FBI evidence records, then identified Maxwell and Epstein in a proposed photograph exhibit.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 7

DirectKimberly MederMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Kimberly Meder identified photographs from investigation CDs as the court admitted a series of Government exhibits, including two under seal.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossStephen FlatleyLaura A. MenningerMentioned

Summary

Stephen Flatley acknowledged limits on identifying the original cloned drive, the computer's location, document authorship, and who could access the computer.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectCarolynMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Carolyn testified that Maxwell arranged appointments at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house and described repeated paid, sexualized massage encounters beginning when she was 14.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossCarolynJeffrey S. PagliucaMentioned

Summary

Defense challenged Carolyn with earlier statements and filings, while the court limited some impeachment evidence and allowed selected complaint and interrogatory excerpts.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

RedirectCarolynMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Carolyn addressed prior records, her age when she first encountered Maxwell and Epstein, and her stated reasons for testifying.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 8

DirectShawnMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Shawn described Carolyn's introduction to Jeffrey Epstein, repeated visits to the Palm Beach house, cash payments, and calls he said arranged her work.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossShawnJeffrey S. PagliucaMentioned

Summary

Shawn was questioned about the limits of his caller-identification testimony and acknowledged receiving money from Carolyn and using drugs with her.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectNicole HesseAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Nicole Hesse described working at the Palm Beach home, receiving directions from Maxwell, and using message pads later identified as Government Exhibits 1, 2, and 3.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectNicole HesseAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Nicole Hesse identified Carolyn on several message-pad exhibits and described her part-time work at the Palm Beach house.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossNicole HesseJeffrey S. PagliucaMentioned

Summary

Nicole Hesse described limited firsthand knowledge of events at the Palm Beach house as the defense distinguished her message-pad entries from those written by others.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectDavid RodgersMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Pilot David Rodgers authenticated his flight logbook and described Maxwell's role in flight communications and Epstein's operations.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectDavid RodgersMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

David Rodgers used flight-log entries to identify travel involving Epstein, Maxwell, Jane, and Virginia Roberts; the jury also viewed Government Exhibit 14.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossDavid RodgersChristian R. EverdellMentioned

Summary

David Rodgers acknowledged that key flight-date testimony rested on his logbook, whose earlier entries listed only Jane's true first name, while describing his observations and Maxwell's work role.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 9

CrossTracy ChapellChristian R. EverdellMentioned

Summary

Defense counsel used FedEx invoice entries to distinguish listed senders, and the court admitted a defense set of additional verified invoices under temporary seal.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 10

ProceduralExhibit 52 Admission RulingMentioned

Summary

The Court admitted six stipulated pages of Government Exhibit 52 with a limiting instruction after clarifying that the full exhibit had not been moved into evidence.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectAnnie FarmerLara PomerantzMentioned

Summary

Annie testified about a 1995 New York trip, her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, and journal entries describing her reaction to touching during a movie.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectAnnie FarmerLara PomerantzMentioned

Summary

Annie described a 1996 New Mexico trip involving Maxwell and Epstein, including alleged touching during a movie, a foot-massage demonstration, and a massage by Maxwell.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectAnnie FarmerLara PomerantzMentioned

Summary

Annie described earlier disclosures and interviews, then testified about a $1.5 million victim-compensation-fund award and her lack of a financial stake in the verdict.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

RedirectAnnie FarmerLara PomerantzMentioned

Summary

Annie reaffirmed parts of her 2006 FBI account and explained why she remembered the alleged massage; the Court resolved repeated defense objections during redirect.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectDavid James MulliganLara PomerantzMentioned

Summary

Mulligan recounted Annie Farmer's reported disclosures about trips and alleged conduct involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including a New Mexico massage.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectJanice SwainLara PomerantzMentioned

Summary

Janice Swain described Epstein's calls about Annie Farmer's trips, her reasons for allowing them, and Annie's withdrawn demeanor after returning from New Mexico.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossJanice SwainLaura A. MenningerMentioned

Summary

Swain said she had no direct contact with Maxwell and did not know what Maxwell knew about Annie's trip; the Court limited Rule 806 questioning before the government rested.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 11

ProceduralKinnerton Street Evidence Hearing1highlightMentioned

Summary

Judge Nathan proposed a stipulation on Kinnerton Street ownership timing and Ms. Maxwell's deposition testimony after arguments over its impeachment value.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

evidence eventDefense counsel proffered certified land-registry records and other transaction records as support for an inference about when Ms. Maxwell lived at 44 Kinnerton Street.Open in transcript →
DirectCimberly EspinosaChristian R. EverdellMentioned

Summary

Ms. Espinosa described Maxwell's estate-management work, Jane's contacts with the office, and defense exhibits involving mailed headshots, while saying she never observed inappropriate conduct with underage girls.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 12

CrossAmanda YoungMaurene ComeyMentioned

Summary

Young described Jane's disclosures as occurring over time and confirmed the reports were summaries; the court sustained scope objections.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

CrossEva Andersson DubinAlison MoeMentioned

Summary

Dr. Dubin described limited knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house and acknowledged memory difficulties that she believed related to medical issues.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectMichelle HealyLaura A. MenningerMentioned

Summary

Ms. Healy described her work at J. Epstein and Company, gave a favorable account of Maxwell as a supervisor, and denied involvement in alleged group sexualized massages.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 14

ClosingDefense closing argumentMentioned

Summary

Menninger urged acquittal, arguing that the government had not proved Maxwell's participation in the charged conduct beyond a reasonable doubt.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 17

Day 18

Day 19